banner

Review Article - (2025) Volume 15, Issue 1

Applications of Bradford's Law of Scattering of Monkeypox Virus Literature on Global Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

Mahendra Kumar Patel* and Maya Verma
 
*Correspondence: Mahendra Kumar Patel, Department of Library and Information Science, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Raipur, India, Email:

Author info »

Abstract

Over the past few years, monkeypox has gained attention and concern. This rare viral disease, similar to smallpox, is caused by the monkeypox virus and primarily affects animals such as rodents, monkeys, and other mammals in Central and West Africa. The aim of the study is to analyze the growth and trend of monkeypox research at global level from 1989 to 2023 and data has been retrieved from Web of Science database. The analysis includes source-wise, country-wise, author-wise distribution, Relative Growth Rate (RGR) and Doubling Time (DT). The study found that 484 articles were scattered in 155 journals. The most productive journal is found to be Journal of Virology with 126 articles followed by Virology with 41 articles. Ruml T was the most productive author during the study period and published 75 articles and received 1208 Global citation score. USA, Czech Republic were the most contributing countries in the world. Bradford’s law of scattering is tested and found the data set is not fitted in this law. The Bradford’s multiplier is 8.81 and found error percentage is high i.e., 10.6.

Keywords

Monkeypox virus, Bibliometric, Relative growth rate, Bradford’s law, Author productivity, Authorship pattern.

Introduction

The monkeypox virus is an orthopoxvirus that causes mpox (monkeypox), a disease with symptoms similar to smallpox, although less severe. While smallpox was eradicated in 1980, mpox continues to occur in countries of central and West Africa. Since May 2022, cases have also been reported from countries without previously documented mpox transmission outside the African region. (Monkeypox) Mpox is a rare disease similar to smallpox caused by the mpox virus. It’s found mostly in areas of Africa, but has been seen in other regions of the world. It causes flu-like symptoms such as fever and chills, and a rash that can take weeks to clear. There’s no proven treatment for Mpox, but it usually goes away on its own. Mpox was discovered in 1958 when two outbreaks of a pox-like disease occurred in groups of monkeys being used for research. It’s spread mainly through human contact with infected rodents, but can sometimes be spread through skin-to-skin contact with a person who is infected. There are two known types (clades) of Mpox virus one that originated in Central Africa and one that originated in West Africa. The current world outbreak (2022) is caused by the less severe West African clade [1].

A rash with sores that can look like pimples or blisters. It could be on the face, inside the mouth, and on other parts of the body, like the hands, feet, chest, genitals, or anus. It goes through different stages, including scabs, before healing. This can take 2-4 weeks. Since Mpox and smallpox are similar, antiviral medicines that protect against smallpox may also help treat Mpox.

Antiviral medicines may be recommended for people who are more likely to get severely ill, such as patients who have weakened immune systems. The U.S. government has two vaccines in the U.S. to protect against Mpox. One was approved for smallpox and Mpox (JYNNEOS), and the other was approved for smallpox (ACAM2000). The continuous emergence of the MPX epidemic has attracted widespread attention around the world and has been suspected to be a potential threat to wider populations [2-4].

Bibliometrics is an emerging thrust area of research from different branches of human knowledge. Bibliometrics has become a standard tool of science policy and research management in the last decades. All significant compilations of science indicators heavily rely on publication and citation statistics and other, more sophisticated bibliometric techniques. Bibliometrics is a quantitative evaluation of publication patterns of all macro and micro communication along with their authorship by mathematical and statistical calculation. Bibliometrics can be applied to any subject area and to most of the problems concerned with written communication. It helps to monitor growth of literature and patterns of research [5]. Bibliometric methodologies are considered useful as supporting tools for decision-making in setting research priorities, tracking the evolution of science and technology, funding allocation, and rewarding scientific excellence, among others.

In the present study, bibliometric analysis is conducted on research on monkeypox virus. In this study, it has been tried to determine the source distribution of monkeypox virus research literature, the types of institutions that participate in it, the language distribution, the year distribution, the relative growth rate and the doubling time, as well as the distribution of publications by country [6].

Literature Review

Yu Weijie, Zhang Xizowen, et al. conducted a bibliometric analysis and key messages of monkeypox research analyzed 1822 articles published in PubMed and Web of Science during the year 2003 to 2022. Bibliometric tools like Vos viewer and CiteSpace used for analyzing and mapping the data. Co-operation pattern used for different authors and countries using Vos viewer software. United States and Centre’s for Disease Control and Prevention-USA (CDC) were the top contributing and country and Institute in producing monkeypox research literature. The study revealed that focus on control method should be suggested than vaccines and future research should be conducted in the field of monkeypox [7].

Rehan Syeda Tayyaba, Hussain Hassan Ul, et al. in their article Global monkeypox virus outbreak 2022: A bibliometric analysis revealed that a gradual increase of publication began in January 2022 and reached a peak in May 2022. Among the European regions, United States has the highest number of research articles of about 41 and 9.87% followed by the United Kingdom 35 and 8.43% of documents. 44 research articles were funded by 82 funding agencies while 371 were not. The result finds the articles should be supported financially and administratively. Research on the monkeypox virus needs to be expanded, as original articles are increasingly in demand [8].

Sofyantoro Fajar, Kusuma Hendrix I, et al. conducted a bibliometric analysis on global research profile on monkeypox related literature. Using the SCOPUS database, the data were retrieved till 19 November 2022 from 1962 to 2022. 422 documents were retrieved and mapped and analyzed through bibliometric indicators. It is noticed that 90.3% of documents were published from 2002 and 2022. USA being the top most country on contributing publications followed by UK and India. Indian journal of surgery, journal of medical virology and travel medicine and infectious disease received more citations. The literature growth rate gradually increased from 2003 and highest published from beginning of 2022.

Lin Jiyong, LI Guiju, et al conducted a bibliometric analysis of human monkeypox research and novel prevention and control strategies. From Web of Science Core Collection, the data were retrieved from 1975-2022. It is noticed that 1008 publications were downloaded on monkeypox research. By using Vos viewer software, bibliometric analysis was performed. The study noticed that American researcher published 663 papers and USA being the top contributing country on monkeypox researches. Journal of Virology ranked first in contributing publications. It was noticed that human monkeypox literature was grown from 2003. Through the bibliometric analysis it is found that in the field of monkeypox research deserves more attention in further research, policy making, treatment and management [9].

Adeiza Shuaibu, Shuaibu Abdul Malik in their research paper titled “Trends in Monkeypox research: A sixty-year bibliometric analysis" describes the research output and trend in monkeypox from 1962-2022. The study analyzed the country wise distribution, year wise distribution, prolific author etc. The study explored different bibliometric tools like Bibliometrix, Biblio, Vos viewer, CiteNetExplorer and Sci2tool for analyzing the documents. Quantitative methods used in bibliometric analysis of articles. The study revealed that US was the top contributing country followed by Germany, UK, Russia and DRC. Among African countries, Nigeria and DRC (Democratic Republic of the Congo) has the most documents on monkeypox virus [10].

Zeeshan Hafiz Muhammad, Rubab Aqsa, et al examined a study on global research trends on Monkeypox virus: A bibliometric and visualized study. The study revealed that the top contributing country in monkeypox virus was US of about 275 documents. 365 publications contributed by the top organization centers for disease control and prevention from United States. Journal of Virology has most citations and h-index of 18. The result revealed that overall worldwide contribution United States had top contributing and seen significant growth in production of Monkeypox research articles [10-12].

Objectives of the study

The primary objective of the study is to know the research output in the monkeypox virus research during the study period of 1989-2023. The objectives of the study are as fallows.

• To find out the source wise distribution in the field of monkeypox virus.
• To find out the year wise distribution of the articles. • To study the relative growth rate and doubling time of articles.
• To study the journal distribution of the articles.
• To find the geographical wise distribution of articles.
• To find the most prolific author.
• To evaluate the Authorship pattern.
• To verify the Bradford law of scattering in monkeypox literature.

Methodology

In this research, we used Web of Science to search for 484 publications related to monkeypox from 1989-2023. The data is collected till 24 May 2023. Search terms used for the collection of data were "Monkey pox" or "Monkey virus". Using Web of Science, the data was retrieved in Text (txt) format. The data was then analyzed using Histcite and Biblioshiny software programs and the results were presented in tables and graphs generated from Microsoft Excel. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge on monkeypox through a comprehensive analysis of these publications [13,14].

Results

Data analysis and interpretation

Source wise distribution: Table 1 and Figure 1 depict the publication distributions by source for Monkeypox virus research. The highest publication is the journal article with 376 publications, followed by reviews with 54 publications, meeting abstracts with 14 publications, and early access, book chapters, editorial materials, and book reviews with one publication each.

S. no Source Records
1 Article 376
2 Review 54
3 Meeting abstract 14
4 Editorial material 8
5 Note 7
6 Letter 7
7 Article; proceedings paper 6
8 News item 6
9 Letter; early access 2
10 Article; early access 1
11 Article; book chapter 1
12 Editorial material; early access 1
13 Book review 1
  Total 484

Table 1: Source wise distribution of publication

ijlis-graph

Figure 1: Graph shows the source wise distribution of publication

Year wise distribution

Table 2 shows the year wise publication. The highest publication is in 2003 with 27 publications followed by 26 publications in 2022 and 23 publications in 2001. The least publication is 01 publications in 1990. A graph depicting the growth and decline in publications related to monkeypox research can be seen in the Figure 2.

S. N Publication year Recs GCS % S. N Publication year Recs GCS %
1 1989 2 19 0.41 19 2007 15 609 3.10
2 1990 1 1 0.21 20 2008 11 738 2.27
3 1991 12 802 2.48 21 2009 19 350 3.93
4 1992 15 809 3.10 22 2010 12 236 2.48
5 1993 11 301 2.27 23 2011 16 821 3.31
6 1994 13 966 2.69 24 2012 11 331 2.27
7 1995 16 1069 3.31 25 2013 11 289 2.27
8 1996 17 815 3.51 26 2014 19 341 3.93
9 1997 18 869 3.72 27 2015 9 362 1.86
10 1998 11 587 2.27 28 2016 14 180 2.89
11 1999 21 1325 4.34 29 2017 6 53 1.24
12 2000 14 520 2.89 30 2018 11 53 2.27
13 2001 23 1045 4.75 31 2019 5 37 1.03
14 2002 11 888 2.27 32 2020 11 71 2.27
15 2003 27 1422 5.58 33 2021 13 75 2.69
16 2004 21 777 4.34 34 2022 26 25 5.37
17 2005 18 548 3.72 35 2023 7 5 1.45
18 2006 17 437 3.51   Total 484   100.00

Table 2: Year wise distribution of publication

ijlis-graph

Figure 2: This graph shows the year wise distribution of publication

Relative growth rate and doubling time

The mathematical representation of the mean relative growth rate of articles over a specific period is derived from the following formula:
RGR = W 2 -W 1/ T 2 -T1
where RGR=Growth Rate over the specific period of the interval
W1=Log (natural log of the initial number of contributions)
W2=Log (natural log of the final number of contributions)
T1=The unit of initial time
T2=The unit of final time(Verma and Shukla)
Doubling time formula: Dt=0.693/R

Table 3 indicates the relative growth rate and doubling time of publications on Monkeypox research. RGR means the increase in the number of publications per unit of time. It is also called the exponential growth rate or continuous growth rate concerning scientific literature publication. In 1992, the relative growth rate of publications was 0.69, but by 2023 it drops to 0.01. Over the first five years (1989 to 1993), the mean relative growth rate was 0.60, but over the last five years (2019 to 2023) it was 0.01.

The doubling time is related to RGR. The doubling time of publications was increased from 1.70 in 1990 to 102.15 in 2019. The table shows a decrease in relative growth rate and an increase in doubling time (Figure 3).

Relative growth rate
Publication year Recs Cumulative W1 W2 RGR Mean Dt
1989 2 2 0 0.69 0 0.60 0
1990 1 3 0.69 1.10 0.41 1.70
1991 12 15 1.10 2.71 1.61 0.43
1992 15 30 2.71 3.40 0.69 1.00
1993 11 41 3.40 3.71 0.31 2.21
1994 13 54 3.71 3.99 0.28 0.21 2.48
1995 16 70 3.99 4.25 0.26 2.68
1996 17 87 4.25 4.47 0.22 3.21
1997 18 105 4.47 4.65 0.18 3.77
1998 11 116 4.65 4.75 0.10 6.69
1999 21 137 4.75 4.92 0.17 0.12 4.08
2000 14 151 4.92 5.02 0.10 7.12
2001 23 174 5.02 5.16 0.14 4.98
2002 11 185 5.16 5.22 0.06 11.48
2003 27 212 5.22 5.36 0.14 5.07
2004 21 233 5.36 5.45 0.09 0.06 7.61
2005 18 251 5.45 5.53 0.08 9.18
2006 17 268 5.53 5.59 0.06 11.36
2007 15 283 5.59 5.65 0.06 12.50
2008 11 294 5.65 5.68 0.03 20.64
2009 19 313 5.68 5.75 0.07   0.04 10.47
2010 12 325 5.75 5.78 0.03 20.49
2011 16 341 5.78 5.83 0.05 13.36
2012 11 352 5.83 5.86 0.03 20.61
2013 11 363 5.86 5.89 0.03 20.14
2014 19 382 5.89 5.95 0.06   0.03 12.50
2015 9 391 5.95 5.97 0.02 37.04
2016 14 405 5.97 6.00 0.03 20.45
2017 6 411 6.00 6.02 0.02 37.27
2018 11 422 6.02 6.05 0.03 27.71
2019 5 427 6.05 6.06 0.01   0.03 102.15
2020 11 438 6.06 6.08 0.02 31.19
2021 13 451 6.08 6.11 0.03 22.02
2022 26 477 6.11 6.17 0.06 12.05
2023 7 484 6.17 6.18 0.01 57.34

Table 4: Top 15 Journal wise distribution of publication

Table 3: Relative growth rate and doubling time of publication

ijlis-graph

Figure 3: Graph shows the relative growth rate and doubling time of publication

Most productive journal

Table 4 revealed the top 15 journal wise distribution of publication. Out of 484 articles, 126 articles have been published in journal of virology, 41 articles in virology, 14 in virus Basel and lowest articles with 5 in journal of virological methods (Figure 4).

S. no Journal Records
1 Journal of Virology 126
2 Virology 41
3 Viruses-Basel 14
4 Journal of Molecular 0Biology 13
5 Journal of Biological Chemistry 12
6 Journal of General Virology 11
7 Retrovirology 11
8 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 10
9 Virus Research 10
10 Plos One 7
11 Archives of Virology 7
12 Protein Expression and Purification 5
13 Embo Journal 5
14 Plos Pathogens 5
15 Journal of Virological Methods 5

ijlis-graph

Figure 4: Graph shows the top 15 journal wise distribution of publication

Country wise distribution

Table 5 shows the highly contributing countries in Monkeypox research. Out of 10 contributing countries USA is the top most contributing country with 290 articles followed by Czech Republic with 95 articles ranked second, 42 from Germany, France contributed 33 publications and India contributes 09 articles and is ranked 10th (Figure 5)

S. no Country Recs GCS
1 USA 290 13403
2 Czech Republic 95 1484
3 Germany 42 1561
4 France 33 1092
5 UK 24 973
6 U Arab Emirates 16 166
7 Scotland 11 215
8 Canada 9 322
9 Hungary 9 112
10 India 9 77

Table 5: Top 10 country wise distribution of publication

ijlis-graph

Figure 5: This graph shows the top 10 country wise distribution of publication.

Prolific author wise distribution

The Table 6 shows the Ruml T was the most productive author during the study period. He published 75 articles and received 1208 Global citation score. Hunter E is the second top contributing author with 62 articles and received 2646 Global citation score. Rumlova M had published 45 articles and received 748 Gcs. The least number of articles was contributed by Briggs JAG with 08 publications and ranked 20. According to the above discussion, Ruml T and Hunter E are emerging as the most prolific authors working in monkeypox research.

S. no Author Recs GCS
1 Ruml T 71 1208
2 Hunter E 62 2646
3 Rumlova M 45 748
4 Pichova I 36 474
5 Hrabal R 20 158
6 Rizvi TA 20 319
7 Hadravova R 19 175
8 Krizova I 18 136
9 Ulbrich P 17 310
10 Hammarskjold ML 13 1273
11 Mustafa F 13 118
12 Prchal J 12 77
13 Rekosh D 12 1231
14 Sakalian M 12 245
15 Dolezal M 11 72
16 Krausslich HG 11 797
17 Dostalkova A 10 30
18 Goff SP 9 662
19 Zabransky A 9 89
20 Briggs JAG 8 602

Table 6: Top 20 Author wise distribution of publication

Authorship pattern of publication

Table 7 shows the authorship pattern of articles. Out of 484 articles, 31 (6.40%) articles are written by single authors, 66 (13.64%) articles are written by double authors, 73 (15.08%) articles are written by triple author and 314 (64.88%) articles are written by more than three authors. It is evident that multiple authors predominate over single, double, and triple authors. Authorship patterns reveal a significant difference between single and multiple authors (Figure 6).

S. no No of authors Records Percentage
1 Single 31 6.4
2 Double 66 13.64
3 Triple 73 15.08
4 More than three author 314 64.88
  Total 484 100

ijlis-graph

Figure 6: Graph shows the authorship pattern of publication.

Ranking of journals

Table 8 shows the ranked list of journals. In the study period from 1989 to 2023, the author preferred journals. A total of 484 articles were published in 155 journals. Almost one third of all articles are published in the top 3 journals. The most preferred journal is Journal of Virology with 126 articles followed by Virology with 41 articles and Viruses-Basel with 14 articles.

S. No Source Rank Freq CumFreq
1 Journal of Virology 1 126 126
2 Virology 2 41 167
3 Viruses-Basel 3 14 181
4 Journal of Molecular Biology 4 13 194
5 Journal of Biological Chemistry 5 12 206
6 Journal of General Virology 6 11 217
7 Retrovirology 7 11 228
8 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 8 10 238
9 Virus research 9 10 248
10 Archives of Virology 10 7 255
11 Plos One 11 7 262
12 Embo Journal 12 5 267
13 European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 13 5 272
14 Journal of Virological Methods 14 5 277
15 Plos Pathogens 15 5 282
16 Protein Expression and Purification 16 5 287
17 Febs Journal 17 4 291
18 Febs Open Bio 18 4 295
19 Journal of Medical Primatology 19 4 299
20 Nature 20 4 303
21 RNA 21 4 307
22 Aids 22 3 310
23 Aids research and Human Retroviruses 23 3 313
24 Biomolecular Nmr Assignments 24 3 316
25 Chemicke Listy 25 3 319
26 Frontiers in microbiology 26 3 322
27 Journal of cellular biochemistry 27 3 325
28 Journal of neurovirology 28 3 328
29 Protein science 29 3 331
30 Traffic 30 3 334
31 Acta crystallographica section d-structural biology 31 2 336
32 Acta virologica 32 2 338
33 Antiviral research 33 2 340
34 Archives of biochemistry and biophysics 34 2 342
35 Febs letters 35 2 344
36 Gene therapy 36 2 346
37 Human gene therapy 37 2 348
38 Immunology letters 38 2 350
39 International journal of cancer 39 2 352
40 International journal of molecular sciences 40 2 354
41 Jnci-journal of the national cancer institute 41 2 356
42 Journal of biomolecular nmr 42 2 358
43 Journal of cell biology 43 2 360
44 Laboratory animal science 44 2 362
45 Medical hypotheses 45 2 364
46 Molecular and cellular biology 46 2 366
47 Molecular biology 47 2 368
48 Molecular biology of the cell 48 2 370
49 Molecules 49 2 372
50 New scientist 50 2 374
51 Nucleic acids research 51 2 376
52 Science 52 2 378
53 Scientific reports 53 2 380
54 Seminars in cell & developmental biology 54 2 382
55 Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde 55 2 384
56 Acta neurologica scandinavica 56 1 385
57 Acta psychiatrica scandinavica 57 1 386
58 Acta veterinaria hungarica 58 1 387
59 American journal of hematology 59 1 388
60 American journal of obstetrics & gynecology mfm 60 1 389
61 Analytical biochemistry 61 1 390
62 Analytical chemistry 62 1 391
63 Animation-an interdisciplinary journal 63 1 392
64 Annual review of virology, vol 1 64 1 393
65 Antioxidants 65 1 394
66 Applied sciences-basel 66 1 395
67 Aspartic proteinases: retroviral and cellular enzymes 67 1 396
68 Australasian journal of dermatology 68 1 397
69 Biochemical society transactions 69 1 398
70 Biochemistry 70 1 399
71 Biologicals 71 1 400
72 Biomed research international 72 1 401
73 Biomedicines 73 1 402
74 Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry 74 1 403
75 Biotechnology advances 75 1 404
76 British journal of cancer 76 1 405
77 Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine 77 1 406
78 Bundesgesundheitsblatt-gesundheitsforschung-gesundheitsschutz 78 1 407
79 Cell host & microbe 79 1 408
80 Cellular microbiology 80 1 409
81 Cerebral cortex 81 1 410
82 Clinical chemistry 82 1 411
83 Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology 83 1 412
84 Clinics in laboratory medicine 84 1 413
85 Comparative immunology microbiology and infectious diseases 85 1 414
86 Computational Biology and Chemistry 86 1 415
87 Current opinion in Structural Biology 87 1 416
88 Embo Reports 88 1 417
89 Emerging Infectious diseases 89 1 418
90 European Journal of Biochemistry 90 1 419
91 Fractals-Complex Geometry Patterns and Scaling in Nature and Society 91 1 420
92 Frontiers in Immunology 92 1 421
93 Frontiers in Public Health 93 1 422
94 Future Medicinal Chemistry 94 1 423
95 Genetic Analysis-Biomolecular Engineering 95 1 424
96 Indian Journal of Dermatology 96 1 425
97 Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology 97 1 426
98 International Journal of Infectious diseases 98 1 427
99 International Journal of Surgery 99 1 428
100 Intervirology 100 1 429
101 55 journals with 1 article 55 55 55
  155 Journals   484 484

Table 8: Ranked list of journals

Discussion

Application of Bradford law of scattering

Samuel Clement Bradford, observed the scattering of articles on specific subjects in various journals. He pointed out that if scientific journals are arranged in order of decreasing productivity of articles on a given subject, they may be divided into a nucleus of periodicals more particularly devoted to the subject and several groups and zones containing the same number of articles as the nucleus when the number of periodicals in the nucleus and succeeding zones will be 1: n: n2. Bradford’s Law states that journals in a single field can be divided into three parts, each containing the same number of articles

• A core of journals on the subject, relatively few in number, that producesapproximately one-third of all the articles;
• A second zone, containing the same number of articles as the first, but a greater number of journals, and
• A third zone, containing the same number of articles as the second, but a still greater number of journals.

The mathematical relationship of the number of journals core to the first zone is a constant n and to the second zone, the relationship is n². Bradford expressed this relationship as 1:n:n² (Table 9).

Zone Number of journals Number of articles Percentage Bradford multiplier
1 02 167 34.50 -
2 25 158 32.64 12.5
3 128 159 32.85 5.12
Total 155 484 99.99 Mean 8.81

Table 9: Bradford’s law of scattering in Monkeypox literature

The Bradford’s mathematical interpretation of the law is 1:n: n2. The total numbers of journal articles were grouped into 3 equal zones producing similar number of articles. It is observed that 155 journals contain 484 articles and these 155 journals divided into three zones, i.e., 1st zone contain 02 journals that covered 167 articles, 2nd zone contain 25 journals covered 158 articles and 3rd zone contain 128 journals covered 159 articles. 1/3 of articles covered by three zones. The connection of each zone in this study is 02:25:128. Here 02 is the number of journals in the nucles zone and mean Bradford’s multiplier ‘n’ is 8.81.

Here, 2: 2 × 8.81: 2 × (8.81)2
2: 17.62: 155.2322>174.8522
Percentage error = (174.85-155)/155 × 100 = 19.85/155× 100 = 10.56
Based on the data, it is clear that the Error Percentage is very high. The distribution of monkeypox literature does not fit Bradford's Law of Scattering.

Findings

The major findings of the monkeypox research are as follows:

• The finding shows the highest publication is the journal article with 376 publications followed by 54 publications Reviews and 14 publications meeting abstracts and least with early access, book chapter and editorial material.
• The highest number of articles was published in the year 2003 is 27 (5.58%), where least number of articles was published in the year 1990 i.e., 1 (0.21%).
• The finding reveals the relative growth rate is decreasing i.e., in 1992 was 0.69 but by 2023 it drops to 0.01, and doubling time of publication is increasing i.e., 1.70 in 1990 to 102.15 in 2019.
• Journal of virology contributed highest number of articles i.e., 126 out of 484 articles. USA, Czech Republic and Germany were the leading countries of maximum contribution and contributed 290, 95 and 42articles.
• Ruml T, Hunter E, Rumlova M and Pichova were the most productive author of monkeypox virus research.

According to Bradford’s law the relationship of is zone is 1:n:n2 and the findings shows the error percentage is high so the Bradford’s law of scattering is not fitted in monkeypox research.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the research on monkeypox has revealed several important findings. The analysis of monkeypox research based on source-wise, year-wise, author-wise, country-wise and ranking of journals perspectives has provided valuable insights. It has helped identify prolific authors and countries that have made significant contributions to this field. It is found that Bradford Law does not fit well when analyzing the distribution of research articles on monkeypox. Further research should focus on exploring new treatment options, improving diagnostic methods, and developing effective prevention strategies. In conclusion, while there is still much to learn about monkeypox, it is important for future research to be based on current research. Based on these findings and research gaps, we can make progress towards better control and management of this infectious disease.

References

Author Info

Mahendra Kumar Patel* and Maya Verma
 
Department of Library and Information Science, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Raipur, India
 

Received: 04-Aug-2023, Manuscript No. IJLIS-23-109280; Editor assigned: 08-Aug-2023, Pre QC No. IJLIS-23-109280 (PQ); Reviewed: 22-Aug-2023, QC No. IJLIS-23-109280; Revised: 19-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. IJLIS-23-109280 (R); Published: 26-Jan-2025, DOI: 10.35248/2231-4911.25.15.857

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Get the App